Kelo Case- A home lost for what???

November 12, 2009 at 12:43 pm 3 comments

The End of an Eminent Domain Error:
Pfizer R&D Headquarters Closes in New London, Conn.

Land Taken in Infamous Kelo Supreme Court Case Remains Empty More Than Four Years After Ruling


Arlington, Va.—Pfizer, Inc., announced today that the company will be closing its former research and development headquarters in New London, Conn. This was a project that involved massive corporate welfare and led to the abuse of eminent domain that ultimately bulldozed the home of Susette Kelo and her neighbors in the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case Kelo v. City of New London.

This was the same bogus development plan that five justices of the U.S. Supreme Court refused to question when the property owners of New London pleaded to have their homes spared from the wrecking ball. Justices mentioned that there was a plan in place, and that so long as lawmakers who are looking to use eminent domain for someone’s private gain had a plan, the courts would wash their hands. Now, more than four years after the redevelopment scheme passed constitutional muster—allowing government to take land from one private owner only to hand that land over to another private party who happens to have more political influence—the plant that had been the magnet for the development is closing its doors and the very land where Susette Kelo’s home once stood remains barren to all but feral cats, seagulls and weeds.

Scott Bullock, who argued the Kelo case for the Institute for Justice on behalf of the New London homeowners, said, “Today’s announcement that Pfizer is closing its research facility in New London demonstrates the folly of government plans that involve massive corporate welfare and that abuse eminent domain for private development. The majority opinion in Kelo v. New London described the Fort Trumbull project as a ‘carefully considered’ plan, but it has been an unmitigated disaster from start—and now—to finish.”

Bullock continued, “Project supporters blame the economic downturn for this turn of events. That is all the more reason why taxpayer dollars should not be put at risk in speculative and risky development schemes.”

Despite the Court’s Kelo ruling, much change for the good has occurred.

Dana Berliner, a senior attorney with the Institute for Justice and co-counsel in the Kelo case, said, “In the face of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Kelo ruling, 43 states have now reformed their laws to better protect property owners. What’s more, seven state high courts have stepped in post-Kelo to protect the rights of homeowners against eminent domain abuse. The high courts of Hawaii, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Missouri, New Jersey and Rhode Island have all ruled in favor of property owners and against eminent domain for private gain. None has made Kelo the rule under their own state constitutions.”

The tragic saga of the Kelo case is detailed in Jeff Benedict’s book Little Pink House: A True Story of Defiance and Courage (Grand Central Publishing; 2009). In it, Benedict shares with readers how Kelo took on the City of New London, a cast of politically powerful villains and, ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a case that sparked a revolutionary change nationwide in eminent domain laws—except in Connecticut.
# # #

Christina Walsh
Director of Activism and Coalitions
Institute for Justice
901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22203
(703) 682-9320
(703) 682-9321 – fax


Entry filed under: Eminent Domain. Tags: .

“Don’t Let The Memory Of Them Drift Away” YOUR INPUT NEEDED!!!!

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Choon James  |  March 14, 2010 at 3:17 am

    What a shame. There has to be a new federal law that requires thorough examination of all issues, impacts that more fully protect property rights. Vulnerable property owners cannot simply be bulldozed by municipal workers and government. Government must be required to pay for legal expenses if malfeasance is evident. Judges must be required to hear these cases.

    My experience in Hauula, Hawaii 96717 shows that a flawed and manipulated process can too easily take place. Add in dirty politics and a property owner is marginalized.

    Abrogations of property rights must be protected. Eminent domain is a government force as potent and as lethal as a death sentence. Victims deserve hearings. In the case of eminent domain, the crime of the property owner is simply owning a property that the government wants!.

    What a shame that Ms. Kelo was punished so badly. Now what? The crook perpetrators should be investigated and brought to justice. Their bad decisions ruined lives and basic constitutional rights. Shouldn’t they be responsible for this fiasco? The villains got away scott-free?

    This is blatant abuse of government force. The notion of ‘public purpose’ must be reviewed. This charade continues to be rampant.

  • 2. thatwoman  |  March 14, 2010 at 12:24 pm

    James I would suggest contacting the Institute for Justice they are cognizant in all the issues of eminent domain Loraine

  • […] Scott Bullock, who argued the case on behalf of the New London homeowners, said, “Today’s announcement that Pfizer is closing its research facility in New London demonstrates the folly of government plans that involve massive corporate welfare and that abuse eminent domain for private development,” according to A Home Lost For What, on That Woman’s Weblog. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Recent Comments


Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 189 other followers

November 2009
« Oct   Dec »